Comments: Free Access to, RIP

Doesn't WSJ charge for access to their content? Has that changed their influence?

Posted by Jeff S at September 17, 2005 06:28 PM

Right, Jeff, but the parts of the Journal that are still free, principally, are the ones that still actually get read and linked to. Putting specialized business articles of interest only to a limited (and typically wealthier) audience behind a wall for paid subscribers only makes sense; putting generalized opinion pieces back there doesn't. Not unless you've already discounted the extent of your influence anyway.

Posted by Dave J at September 18, 2005 01:56 AM

isn't that what bugmenot is for??

Posted by LilB at September 20, 2005 09:32 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?