Honestly? I think it's brilliant, and I'm shocked how many people have completely misunderstood it. It's clearly meant as a parody of the mindset that sees Obama and his wife as dangerous, terrorist-supporting radicals, and not meant to reinforce those stereotypes at all. The magazine shouldn't even have to explain it; it's sad that they have to.
Posted by Stephen Silver at July 14, 2008 04:36 PMI think it would have made a fine cartoon somewhere within the magazine, where it could benefit from a nearby title. Satirical New Yorker covers should be reserved for lampooning Republicans.
Posted by: jabbett at July 15, 2008 02:01 PM